Skip to content

Supplier Relationship Management – a long way to go

July 27, 2017

In the world of sales, the value of relationships is well understood. A key business goal is to generate repeat customers, to establish a sense of trust and loyalty. This is because, in general, the cost of servicing a repeat customer is lower than the cost of finding and closing new business. Sometimes, it is also true that loyal customers are willing to pay higher prices – or, in the case of less scrupulous suppliers, can be taken advantage of because they are less likely to price shop.

The economics of relationship management is relatively well understood from a sales and marketing perspective and this is reflected in sophisticated segmentation models that generate different levels of relationship support and depth. The range of technologies that are now available has enabled ever-increasing sophistication and variety in the nature and scope of those relationships, taking account of detailed customer preferences, demographics and values to produce targeted and differentiated offerings and terms and conditions.

That same sophistication has been much slower in coming to supplier relationships. Indeed, the more that suppliers have sought to implement strong relationship selling, the more that buyers have felt the need to resist. Global networked technologies opened a world of apparently endless, low cost competition, providing opportunities to achieve price-based savings and encouraging the abandonment of ‘relationships’, which were seen as innately exploitative. Strategic sourcing encouraged a mentality of arm’s-length transactions, controlled interactions and commoditization.

Scrapping relationships came at a cost. Dealing with a constant churn of suppliers has many hidden risks. Loyalty and reliability disappear. Ethical standards become unaffordable. Opportunism becomes the order of the day. One direct consequence of buyer behavior has been a steady growth of national and international regulation, which is now a major cost imposition on business. In other words, the savings achieved through aggressive procurement methods have in large part been eliminated by the additional costs that flow from those methods.

It is this environment which is driving a steady re-think of procurement practices and supply relationships, but often still without the strategic clarity of customer relationship management. Disciplines such as SRM remain confused and struggle in many cases to obtain investment and support. That confusion is evident in the typical program that focuses on a few ‘strategic suppliers’, without having any clarity on the broader approach to supplier relationships in general. As a result, processes and responsibilities often remain confused and benefits are elusive.

Even the most basic analysis quickly demonstrates that today’s practices for establishing and managing customer-supplier interactions make little economic sense. Approaches that are based on lack of trust and openness are by their nature inefficient and frequently self-defeating. While ‘cosy’ and opportunistic relationships are clearly not the answer, what we really need is a shared approach to relational strategies and evaluation – an approach which explores optimised mutual benefit rather than sub-optimal individual gain.




  1. John Jorgensen permalink

    Hi Tim – How would you relate this to the example on Canadian metal scrap recyclers? Your reference above to ‘scrapping relationships came at a cost’ is pertinent, as you cannot ‘app-out’ that relationship that, essentially, builds trust. Question of balance?

    • John
      I understand the comment, but would suggest that with a commodity like scrap metal it is unaffordable to handle issues of trust through a need for personal meetings. It is in areas like this that technology is becoming far more effective and where specific apps and ‘voting websites’ are providinng insight to quality and performance.

  2. Ralph Hernandez permalink

    Supplier Relationship Management is best built upon mutual trust and respect regardless of the leverage one party may have over another. Daily communication with suppliers are critical in order to achieve the goals and objectives of all parties.

  3. Christina Huang permalink

    I agree 100% with your message. Wondering if you could suggest some KPI’s can be used to measure improved SRM relationship.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: