Skip to content

Contract drafting: are current skills adequate?

April 16, 2012

In a blog, acknowledged drafting guru Ken Adams floats the idea of a certifiable standard for contract drafting – and suggests that IACCM might provide the certification.

 

Ken highlights a continuing weakness in drafting skills and style. I think he is right to suggest that today’s complex business environment demands far greater clarity in the way contracts are constructed and expressed.

In an age when specialisms and credentials continue to develop, the idea of certification is certainly not unreasonable. Given the importance of contracts and their need for clarity of intent, Ken’s suggestion seems timely. The recent IACCM study on ‘The Future of Contracting’ has highlighted useability of contracts as one of the pressing issues. By this, it means a need for greater ease of understanding by the many stakeholders involved in both the creation and performance of the contract.

Based on this, my inclination is in fact to go somewhat further than Ken’s suggestion. I think he is right to suggest a formal test for excellence in drafting, but perhaps we should also be teaching skills in design and communication techniques that would support effective execution of the agreed terms and obligations. From different quarters, I have received requests for IACCM to offer a ‘quality kitemark’ for contracts that satisfy various criteria – such as clarity, design and encouraging collaboration.

Traditional drafting of contracts through the use of words is not always adequate to ensure proper communication, especially when concepts are complex. That complexity may not be due to the terms themselves, but can arise from unfamiliarity with language, legal systems or business culture. Good contracts are not about tricking people or catching them out when they fail; they are about reducing the probability of failure. And to achieve this, they must be structured and expressed in ways that minimize the chances of misunderstanding by all those involved in their execution and performance.

Ken’s idea is that individuals could gain a Certificate of Proficiency for drafting and that this might then spread to organizations becoming certified if they implement good practices across their portfolio of contract templates. I support that idea – but the key question is whether practitioners feel the same.

Do you think this is a good idea? Is it an initiative you would welcome?

4 Comments
  1. B.R.Srikanth permalink

    Yes, this will really be helpful, and give a standard for Contracts Professionals. However, the more important question should be “Who is best qualified to be a Contracts Professional?” Is it someone with a law background, or Finance or technical or project management or a bit of all. “Is a Contracts Professional suitable across industries like an Accounts or Finance professional; if not, is it industry specific?

    • Thanks for raising these questions – I will reply to each of them in a future blog.

  2. Esther Chen permalink

    This is a fantastic idea, a Contract is not so much of legalese terms but is mostly on the Specifications, scope of work written by engineers who does not have the skills to write clear, concisely and consistently. This be great for us to learn and then teach to our engineers on writing specifications skills!!!.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Koncision » Certification in Contract Drafting?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: